The agent quoting the highest figure must simply understand the market better than the others.
This is the assumption most sellers land on once three appraisals come back forty to sixty thousand dollars apart. It seems like straightforward logic. Greater market knowledge should translate into a more accurate figure, so the agent quoting the highest number must simply be the one who has researched the property most thoroughly.
The Gap Between Appraisals That Nobody Questions
When a seller gathers three appraisals for the same property, the results are rarely a tight cluster around one figure. The spread is frequently wide enough that at least one number cannot be close to right. Sellers seldom stop to consider which. The default is to believe the highest one, largely because it lines up with what the seller wanted to hear in the first place.
An appraisal is not just a valuation. It is also, whether stated or not, a pitch for the listing itself. Two agents can walk through the same property, see the same comparable sales data, and still arrive at figures tens of thousands of dollars apart, because one of them is pricing the house and the other is pricing the opportunity to win the trust of the seller. This is worth understanding before meeting with any agent at all For those wanting more context before their own appraisal round explore this topic is worth a look before that first meeting. The specifics change from agent to agent, but the underlying pattern rarely does.
Why the Biggest Figure Rarely Reflects True Value
A high quoted figure is not automatically a sign of stronger market knowledge. Just as often it signals a willingness to tell the seller what they want to hear, purely to win the listing. That is not always conscious dishonesty either. Plenty of agents believe their own optimistic number right up until the campaign runs and the market disagrees with them. Either way, the outcome is the same: an agent chosen on a figure that was never really about the genuine value of the property.
The hard part is that this rarely becomes clear until well into the campaign, once several weeks have passed without the interest that the initial appraisal had implied would show up. Recent examples from local campaigns make this easy to see Sellers wanting to understand this dynamic in more depth read the full article is worth a look before appointing anyone. The details vary by campaign, but the underlying lesson tends to repeat.
What a Genuinely Defensible Appraisal Looks Like
The appraisals actually worth listening to are rarely the most confidently delivered ones. They are the ones backed by real comparable sales, recent settlement figures, and a straightforward account of what nearby buyers have genuinely paid in recent months. An agent who can walk a seller through that evidence is doing something entirely different from one who just states a number with certainty. Confidence and accuracy are not the same thing, and sellers who conflate them tend to pick the wrong agent for the wrong reason.
There is an easy way to test this. An agent whose number genuinely holds up can usually name the specific sales it is based on, within a sensible timeframe and a genuinely comparable location. An agent leaning mostly on optimism tends to talk in vague terms about a strong market, without ever pointing to anything concrete behind the figure just quoted.
The property is not the problem here. The appraisal process is.
What Sellers Should Be Evaluating Instead
The right question is rarely which agent believes the property is worth the most. It is closer to which agent has a genuine strategy for reaching real market value, and which one is willing to have an honest conversation if the campaign does not move at the quoted figure straight away. How an agent has previously handled a mid-campaign price adjustment tends to say far more than any number offered at a first meeting ever could.
This is also the point where simply asking reveals the most. An agent prepared to discuss what happens if the first few weeks underperform is doing something very different to one who has only ever talked about the best-case outcome.
Questions Sellers Often Ask About This
Why does the same property get such different appraisal figures from different agents?
Appraisals combine genuine market judgement with an incentive to win the listing, and different agents weigh those two things differently. The spread between quotes often reflects that incentive as much as it reflects the property itself. An agent under pressure to secure new business has a reason to lean optimistic that has nothing to do with the comparable sales in the area.
Can the biggest appraisal figure ever actually be the correct one?
On occasion, yes, but only when the evidence behind it earns that trust, not because it happens to be the biggest figure quoted. A high number backed by real comparable sales bears little resemblance to one offered purely to secure the business, and asking what it is actually based on is the only way to separate the two.
What should sellers ask an agent instead of what is it worth?
Asking what evidence supports the number, and what the plan of the agent is if the property does not attract offers at that figure early on, tends to reveal far more than the number itself. It also tends to separate agents comfortable defending their figure from agents who were hoping the question would not come up.
Does a lower appraisal mean a worse agent?
Not necessarily. A lower, well-supported figure from an agent who can walk through the comparable sales behind it is often a stronger signal than a higher figure with no evidence attached. Sellers who filter agents purely on the size of the number they quote are optimising for the wrong variable entirely.
Rather than a true measurement of the house, an appraisal is really an opening bid for the listing itself, and sellers who recognise this early tend to choose very differently to those chasing the highest figure. Across the Gawler District and the northern Adelaide corridor, where the spread between agent appraisals can be just as wide as elsewhere in Adelaide, this distinction matters more rather than less, given how fast a mispriced campaign can lose momentum where comparable listings surface close together.